Can reactive designs be implemented in any programming language? Or, are some languages and programming paradigms better for building reactive systems? How do traditional design approaches, like Object-Oriented Design (OOD) and Domain-Driven Design (DDD), apply to reactive applications.
Is it just an apology for legacy software and spaghetti IT or is it a meaningful way of describing software systems in particular business contexts? What considerations make a difference when it comes to developing within an enterprise context? What technologies and practices help or hinder?
Derick Bailey talks about the 5 stages of grief, as applied to software development. From denial to acceptance, Derick talks about the direct correlations between dealing with loss and how we deal with other human beings as software developers.
The Web and Spring MVC continue to be one of the most active areas of the Spring Framework with each new release adding plenty of features and refinements requested by the community. Furthermore version 4 added a significant choice for web applications to build WebSocket-style architectures.
During the conference I quickly discovered that there is a certain denial to agile and some see it even as a thread as every conversation is dominated by agile here and agile there. So I was pleased to be allowed to clear some mist from it by particularly looking at …
The old notion of a software architect being a non-coding, post-useful deep thinker is giving way to something far more interesting, says Neal Ford. “Architecture has become much more interesting now because it’s become more encompassing … it’s trying to solve real problems rather than play with abstractions.
